More Pages: Sebastian Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22


Picture book with backbone

Need the pieces!
Good for adult fans of Lego too!
Really Keeps Him Busy!

A story of love and loss
Beautifully written and thought provoking.
A tender and very moving story of love.

Not good, he has written MUCH better books.
Do or DieBerry being a good detective that he is, figured out the mystery. Milo seemed to be getting better and better after this event because the lunch lady was into witchcraft and was putting a spell on both boys. But she was putting the wrong spell on Berry and that's kind of why he figured out who did it!
Yes I liked this book! It was very informing, but at some points there was no point and it was very boring. I think I liked it more then I disliked it!
good book !¡!

Save Your Money
An average anthologyThere are 16 selections in this book. Half of them range from good to great, and the other eight are fairly poor. The writing is okay throughout, with some being more exceptional than others, but it's the stories that differ the most in quality. Six of them, whether written well or not, have virtually no story whatsoever or are very poor. As it turns out, the best stories in this book are also some of the better written. This is where the book's strength shows up. The selections introduce you to stories and books you may have never read and after reading some of the good selections, it makes you want to go read the books they were taken from. So I would mostly recommend this book to people who have not read much or any sea stories. It introduces you to a wide variety of sea literature. But otherwise I would only lightly recommend it by saying that everyone would find some selections that they really like.
Oustanding collection

Trainspotters guide to Bach
Good resource to better aprreciate Bach

how not to write a book1. It constantly tries to SELL you on VRML. Every tenth word is
"exciting".
2. It tells you all sorts of irrelavent stuff, like VMRL 1.0,
early VRML history.
3. It gives almost no examples.
4. It has almost no illustrations of what the VRML will render to.
5. It reads like a W3C reference manual. It constantly presumes you already know everything so there is no need to explain anything.
6. Here is an example of some prose that tells you that you must write "Shape { geometry Sphere" in that order.
"For geometry nodes to appear to the viewer, they must be contained by a Shape node and they can only appear in a geometry
field of a Shape node. Geometry nodes can't be children of group
nodes because they aren't leaf nodes. Geometry nodes, therefore,
must be contained by Shape nodes. The shape node contains one
Geometry node in its geometry field."
ALL THIS WITHOUT A SINGLE EXAMPLE OF WHAT THE HECK HE IS TALKING
ABOUT.
7. You come out the end not able to even do anything more complex than the two simplest W3C examples.
8. 3/4 of the book has nothing to do with how to write VRML.
A Complete Book!The Language is understandable and clear.


Good - In A WayIt's an interesting account but tends to ramble at times. Most of the writing is fairly dry. The author either skims over details or spends way too much time on them.
A nice little refresher if you forgot what college reading was like.
The Constitution is best seen from a distance

Interesting, but one-sided...And, let us not forget that Chechens are supporting Al-Qaida and related extremist,Islamic groups.
Moving account of an unusual warHaving enjoyed this book so much and also having read several others on Chechnya(Anatol Lieven, Carlotta Gall, Anna Politkovskaya) I was amazed by the uninformed review already on this site by a previous reader.
This reviewer says Smith is way too pro-Chechen and never shows the Chechens in a bad light, only the Russians. I found Smith was certainly showing sympathy for this people. But then as a people they are the ones hurting. Their capital Grozny, large parts of other towns, and many of the villages have been flattened by aerial bombardment and artillery. Maybe 100,000 people, probably far more (no one bothers counting anymore) have been killed out of the tiny population. Smith points out early on that the entire Chechen ethnic group is smaller than the Russian armed forces alone. Just think about that.
By concentrating on travels with the Chechen guerrillas, not Russian troops, Smith was able to see the frontlines and feel the same effects of war as the people living in the republic. Any journalist knows that trying to get information from a regular army, especially one committing war crimes, is unlikely to result in anything but lies. If Smith is wrong in believing the Chechen side to be suffering by far the greatest, then so is MSF, Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and the other western journalists who spent time there and wrote books about it (Lieven, Gall etc), not to mention the incredibly brave Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who is one of the very few to dare contradict her government's propaganda.
What has happened in Chechnya makes Kosovo pale in comparison and Milosovic is on trial for war crimes. Even in Bosnia the Serbs did not inflict such massive destruction - they didn't have half the Russian weaponry, after all. If Smith shows admiration for the Chechen guerrillas, then you do have to think about what he says he saw: a few thousand fighters with light infantry weapons tying down up to 100,000 Russian troops armed with helicopters, planes, tanks, artillery etc for several years.
I wonder if that reviewer even read the book. He/she says that the Chechens are not criticised, but on the first page I read Basayev was a terrorist and criminal AS WELL as being a hero to his own entourage. I read of a Chechen father trying to bury his son during a Russian air raid but cursing the Chechen guerrillas who had dragged him into the war. Etc, etc;
And as for there being no irony in writing about Aslan Maskhadov trying to prove he had a "regular" army by obstinately putting his men in unfavourable terrain against the Russian weapons, then that reviewer just doesn't get irony! What I read was just as he had announced this "apocalyptic" policy to Smith, an attack by Russian artillery started and Maskhadov (and Smith we suppose)had to run for their lives. Seems ironic to me.
Then there was some idea that history is given too much play in Allah's Mountains, the reviewer saying that to compare past Chechen-Russian relations so often to the present is like "comparing modern US-Mexican relations to US attempts to kill Pancho Villa".
Now this really IS ludicrous! Surely the whole point Smith was making, and it is one of the main points of the book, was that in a place like Chechnya the past really does sit very heavily on the present.
First you had brutal and long colonial conquest in the 19th century (Chechnya was about the hardest place to conquer in the whole Russian empire); then you moved straight into Soviet repression and Stalin's genocide in the 20th; then you went straight into the chaos and war of the post Soviet period. In other words there was never a moment when people might put the past behind or have any incentive to change their way of thinking. Conflict, conflict, that's all they know in Chechnya.
The reason it's important to understand this is that then you might have an inkling as to why against such ridiculous odds and at such a high price there are still today Chechens going out and blowing up Russian tanks.
Brilliant

This is not a book that has musical notes! Words only!
The importance of text
Important Chorale Textsexp: Dies sind die heil'gen zehn Gebot'
"These are the holy Ten Commandments which our Lord God gave to us through Moses, his true servant, high on Mount Sinai. Kyrie eleison."